Verification of underground excavation stability during tunnel construction
- Proceedings
- EUROCK 2026
- Pages
- 833-838
- Submitted
- 28 January 2026
- Accepted
- 15 June 2026
- Published
- 12 August 2026
Summary
Abstract
Design of tunnels in rock mass using the New Austrian Method (NATM), using the results of geotechnical field investigations and rock mass classifications (GSI, RQD, Q), is most often carried out in the early design stage. Verification of underground opening stability using observational methods is carried out by measuring the behaviour of the reinforced rock mass during the tunnel construction. This paper will present the verification of underground excavation stability in the Mali Prolog and Šubir tunnels on the Zagreb-Split-Ploče highway, near the town of Vrgorac, Croatia. During the tunnel excavation, field investigations and observations were carried out to verify the efficiency of the primary tunnel support and the length of the installed rockbolts. During the tunnel construction, investigation drilling at the tunnel face, geophysical seismic measurements, video-prospecting of investigation boreholes, geological mapping of the tunnel face, convergence measurements, and anchor pull-out tests were carried out. The investigations were carried out in the II, III, and IV categories of rock mass (according to the RMR classification), in which excavation by drilling and blasting was envisaged. Multi-layer reinforced shotcrete and rockbolts were used as the primary tunnel support. Based on measurements and observations, it was necessary to confirm the achieved stability of the underground excavation. If the behaviour, or rather the stability of the underground excavation, significantly deviated from the design criteria, the input parameters of the rock mass were corrected, and the analysis was repeated based on test results and back-analyses. Changes in the support system resulted in additional gradual strengthening or, in some cases, reduction of the support elements of the primary support system.
Index terms
Keywords
Full text
Attachments
Works cited
References
- Antičević H (2011): Determination of Blast Induced damage Rock Mass Damaged Zone in Tunnels.Dissertation atUniversity of Zagreb.
- Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde, J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4): 189-239.
- Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Golser J, Mussger K (1978) The New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM) contractual aspects. Tunnelling Under Difficult Conditions, International Tunnel Symposium, Tokyo, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 387-392.
- ISRM (1974) Suggested Methods for Rockbolt Testing.
- KaićM (2012)TunelŠubir, Engineering geological mapping, Final report. MPsV Ltd., Zagreb.
- Marinos P, Hoek E 2000. GSI: A geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. GeoEng2000 at the international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Melbourne, Technomic publishers, Lancaster.
- Nicholson D, Tse C-M, Penny C (1999). The Observational Method in ground engineering: principles and applications Report 185. CIRIA, London. Report 185.
- Peck RB (1969) Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique19 (2) 171-187.
- Rabcewicz L (1964) The New Austrian Tunnelling Method, Part one. Water Power, 19-24.
- Rabcewicz L, Golser J (1973) Principles of dimensioning the supporting system for theNew Austrian tunnelling method. Water Power, 88-93.
- Terzaghi K, PeckRB (1967) Soil mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley, New York.
- Užarević D (2010) TunelŠubir, Geotechnial design, Civil Engineering Institute of Croatia, Zagreb.
- Užarević D (2011) TunelMali Prolog, Geotechnial design, Civil Engineering Institute of Croatia, Zagreb.