Paper contribution

Safe Footing Distance for an Isolated Footing Adjacent to an Excavation Wall in Jointed Rock Masses

Proceedings
EUROCK 2026
Pages
581-586
Submitted
28 January 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
12 August 2026

Summary

Abstract

Increasing land-use pressure often requires engineers to construct structures in close proximity to a vertical cut and supported by a retaining wall, particularly in hilly regions. In such cases, the footing’s distance from the vertical cut or excavation becomes a critical parameter, as it governs the extent to which excavation-induced effects can be minimized or neglected. Although footings may be placed on either soil or rock, identifying a safe footing location on rock is considerably more complex due to the anisotropic behavior of jointed rock masses compared with the relatively isotropic nature of soils. To investigate this, 2D physical model tests were conducted on an artificial 60°–30° orthogonally jointed rock mass with an isolated footing placed adjacent to an excavation wall. The experimental results indicate that when the footing is positioned beyond a certain safe footing distance, the excavation no longer affects the bearing capacity, regardless of the excavation depth. Complementary finite element modeling analysis was conducted to assess the bending-moment distribution, shear-stress distribution, and load transfer along the excavation wall. The numerical results likewise demonstrate that beyond the safe footing distance, bending moments, shear stresses, and applied loads exhibit similar patterns for different excavation depths.

Contributors

Authors

  1. Argha Biswas Indian Institute Of Technology Roorkee, India ORCID 0009-0008-1375-5679
  2. Mahendra Singh Indian Institute Of Technology Roorkee, India ORCID 0000-0003-3775-7026
  3. Aditya Singh Indian Institute Of Technology Roorkee, India ORCID 0000-0003-4749-2471

Index terms

Keywords

Full text

Attachments

Works cited

References

  1. Biswas A, Singh A, Singh M (2025) Experimental investigation and a method of calculating bearing capacity for jointed rock masses under excavated and unexcavated conditions. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
  2. Biswas A, Singh A, Singh M (2025) The effects of staggered and non-staggered joints on the ultimate bearing capacity, load settlement behavior, and failure mechanism with the change of excavation depths. Rock Mechanics Bulletin 4(1): 100154.
  3. Biswas A, Singh A, Singh M (2025) Comprehensive analysis of excavation walls in jointed rock masses: bending moment, applied stress distribution, and empirical load estimation. (Submitted).
  4. Son M, Adedokun S (2014) Effect of joint cohesive strength on the earth pressure against the support system in a jointed rock mass. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society 30(7): 41–53.
  5. Son M, Adedokun S (2015) Effect of support characteristics on the earth pressure in a jointed rock mass. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 52(12): 1956–1967.
  6. Son M, Adedokun S (2016) Effect of joint inclination angles on the earth pressure against the support system in a jointed rock mass. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(4): 1259–1266.
  7. Son M, Adedokun S (2017a) Earth pressure on a retaining structure in layered and jointed rock masses. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21(4): 1147–1153.
  8. Son M, Adedokun S (2017b) Effect of rock mass condition on the earth pressure against an excavation wall in rock mass: numerical investigation. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society 33(11): 83–95.
  9. Son M, Adedokun S (2018) Effect of the permeability of excavation wall on the earth pressure in a jointed rock mass. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 19(2): 13–21.
  10. Son M, Park J (2014) Physical and numerical tests of the excavation walls in jointed rock masses. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 51(5): 554–569.