Risk‑Informed Foundation Optioneering in Karst Terrain: From Geotechnical Risk to Sustainable Development
- Proceedings
- EUROCK 2026
- Pages
- 249-254
- Submitted
- 6 May 2026
- Accepted
- 15 June 2026
- Published
- 12 August 2026
Summary
Abstract
This study shows that risk-informed geotechnical decision-making provides a clear and reliable foundation for demonstrating sustainability outcomes in karst-affected construction projects across the Middle East. Karst terrain is common in the region and creates significant uncertainty that, if not addressed early, can transfer risks related to safety, project schedule, high material consumption, and elevated carbon emissions to the construction phase. Current practices often respond to this uncertainty with conservative, material-heavy solutions that increase these risks during construction, extend timelines, and increase cost and embodied-carbon consumption. To tackle these issues, the study introduces a design-stage framework in which the Sustainable Development Goals are not used as fixed design rules. Instead, SDGs 3, 8, 12, and 13 naturally arise as outcomes of managing project-specific risks related to safety, project schedule, material usage efficiency, and embodied carbon. Applying this methodology to a high-load building on karstic limestone in Saudi Arabia demonstrates its practical benefits. Comparative analysis shows that a piled foundation better localises and manages karst risks compared to a raft foundation with probing and grouting. This results in lower construction risk exposure (SDG 3), a more predictable project schedule and procurement (SDG 8), reduced material use (SDG 12), and significantly lower embodied carbon in the design stage (SDG 13). Carbon impacts are presented as comparative indicators that reflect uncertainties in regional emissions. The results indicate that sustainable outcomes in rock engineering are best achieved by integrating sustainability into standard risk-based design processes rather than treating it as a separate assessment. Sharing more case studies like this can support the development of consistent, evidence-based practices for managing karst risks sustainably.
Index terms
Keywords
Full text
Attachments
Works cited
References
- BSI (2013) BS EN 1997-1:2004+A1:2013 Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical design –General rules. London: British Standards Institution.
- BSI (2023) PAS 2080: Carbon management in buildings and infrastructure. London: British Standards Institution.
- EFFC and DFI (2013) Methodological and User Guide on EFFC DFI Carbon Calculator. Available at:https://www.effc.org/content/uploads/2020/10/EFFC-DFI-methodological-and-user-guide-v2.2.pdf, last accessed 30/05/2026.
- Hassanain Mohammad A, Al-Harogi Mohammed, Sanni-Anibire Muizz O (2022)Design for safety in the construction industry: a study of architectureand engineering firms in KSA. Facilities, 40(13/14), pp. 895–911.
- HSE (2015) Managing health and safety in construction: Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. London: Health and SafetyExecutive. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/l153.htm, last accessed 30/05/2026.
- ISO (2018a) ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. Geneva: ISO.
- ISO (2018b) ISO 14689:2018 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Identification, description and classification of rock. Geneva: ISO.
- Mahmoud MH, and Deab MA (2021) How to reduce carbon dioxide emissions oninfrastructure projects in the Middle East. Proceedings of theInstitution of Civil Engineers – Civil Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jcien.20.00051.
- Mansour HA, Al-Aidaros A and Zaidi FK (2024) Geological and HydrochemicalProcesses Driving Karst Development in Southeastern Riyadh, Central SaudiArabia. Water. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16141937.
- MoF (2019) Saudi Tenders and Procurement Law. Riyadh: Ministry of Finance, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
- Nawaz B, Spyropoulos E and Al-Saafin A (2020) Risk Assessment for KarstHazards at a Facility in Saudi Arabia—A Case Study. Journal of Geoscienceand Environment Protection, 8, pp. 277–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.85018.
- Pantelidou H, Nicholson D, Gaba G et al. (2012) Sustainable geotechnics. In ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering. ICE Publishing, London, UK,vol. 1, pp. 125–136.
- Rasha SM, Taher SA and Shalaby SM (2022) Climate change adaptation and mitigation in the Middle East: A review of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 160: 112129.
- RIBA (2020) RIBA Plan of Work. Available at:https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/riba-plan-of-work, last accessed 2026/05/30.
- SAVE International (2007) Value Standard and Body of Knowledge (VSBOK). Mount Royal, NJ: SAVE International.
- Saudi Vision (2023) Saudi Vision 2030 and the Circular Carbon Economy. Saudi Vision 2030, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. See https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/progress/environment-nature/ (accessed 30/05/2026).
- SBCNC (Saudi Building Code National Committee) (2018) Saudi Building Code– Structural: Soil and Foundations (SBC 303). Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
- SGS (1991) Geologic Map of the Ar Riyad Quadrangle, Sheet 24, Kingdom of KSA, 1:250,000. Jeddah: Saudi Geological Survey.
- UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs) (2015) The 17 Goals. UNDESA, New York, NY, USA. See https://sdgs.un.org/goals, last accessed 30/05/2026.
- UNFCCC (2023) UN Climate Change Annual Report 2022. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/UNClimateChange_AnnualReport_2022.pdf, last accessed 30/05/2026.
- Waltham TB (2005) Sinkholes and Subsidence: Karst and Cavernous Rocks inEngineering and Construction. Berlin: Springer.
- Wagener F. and Von M. (1984) Foundation design in karst areas. In: Proceedings of the First Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes: TheirGeology, Engineering and Environmental Impact, Orlando, Florida, 15–17October 1984. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.