Paper contribution

Physics-informed theory modelling of rock engineering features from TBM operational data

Proceedings
EUROCK 2026
Pages
659-665
Submitted
30 April 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
12 August 2026

Summary

Abstract

Accurate determination of rock engineering parameters is important for reliable prediction and optimization of tunnel boring machine (TBM) performance. In this study, TBM performance indicators and operational parameters are used to infer key geomechanical properties, including both intact rock and rock mass characteristics, across several lithological units (e.g. Paragneiss, Amphibolite, and calc- phyllite-schist with low to high grade of metamorphism) encountered along the Brenner Base Tunnel (BBT) alignment that connects the cities of Innsbruck (Austria) and Fortezza (Italy). The dataset, derived from both pre-construction investigations and construction-phase monitoring, is divided into geological zones and lithological units, with representative ranges of considering operational parameters and rock mechanical features defined for each zone. A framework based on physics-informed theory, engineering mechanics, and stacking ensemble learning model are developed to establish simulation between machine response, mechanical specifications, and ground conditions. The meta-learner stacking logic is implemented using the ridge cross-validation (RidgeCV) and the ensemble is built on three high-performance tree-based algorithms, including extra trees regressor (ET), hist gradient boosting regressor (HGB), and gradient boosting regressor (GB) based on the polynomial interaction technique. They were selected because they handle geological noise and non-linear relationships differently, therefore, providing a balanced prediction of rock mechanical features. The proposed modeling approach shows predictive accuracy, yielding reliable estimates of rock engineering properties and supporting its applicability to future double shield (DS)-TBM operations in metamorphic rock units.

Contributors

Authors

  1. Hanan Samadi Systra S.p.A.
  2. Andrea Danzi Systra S.p.A.

Index terms

Keywords

Full text

Attachments

Works cited

References

  1. Barton NR (2000) TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rock. Balkema, Rotterdam. Crc Press. p.173.
  2. BBT (1999) Project overview. URL: https://www.bbt-se.com/en/tunnel /project- overview/.
  3. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Rock mass classifications: A complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering John Wiley & Sons: Toronto, ON, Canada.
  4. Bruland A (1998) Hard rock tunnel boring. Ph.D. Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Trondheim.
  5. Deere D (1988) The rock quality designation (RQD) index in practice. InRock classification systems for engineering purposes: 91-101. ASTM International.
  6. Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Zhao J (2011) A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for projectplanning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 26(5):595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.04.004
  7. Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masse. ISRM News Journal 2(2): 4-16.
  8. Palmstrom A (1982) The volumetric joint count—a useful and simple measure of the degree of jointing. In Proceedings of the fourth international congress IAEG V:221-228.
  9. Rostami J (1993) A new model for performance prediction of hard rock TBMs. In Proceedings 1993 rapid excavation and tunnelling conference (RETC).
  10. Samadi H, Karimi H, Khamehchiyan M, Hassanpour J (2024) Prediction of engineering characteristics of rock masses using actual TBM performance data with supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms (a case study in strong to very strong igneous and pyroclastic rocks). Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 57(9):7223-7252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03903-9