Permeability and acoustic emission response characteristics during injection-induced fault slip
- Proceedings
- EUROCK 2026
- Pages
- 139-144
- Submitted
- 28 January 2026
- Accepted
- 15 June 2026
- Published
- 12 August 2026
Summary
Abstract
Here we performed fluid injection experiments on granite samples containing smooth faults under varying initial critical stress states. Results demonstrate that the initial critical stress state exerts first-order control on seismic activity, with critically stressed faults exhibiting stronger seismic responses during activation. During injection, the pressure rapidly increases and then stabilizes at a constant level. Under different critical stress conditions, injection-induced reactivation of faults will result in a different acoustic emission response. Slip events occur abruptly, highlighting the sudden and destructive nature of injection-induced unstable slip. We found that faults closer to critical instability exhibited shorter failure durations, manifested as AE signals concentrated within a narrower time window. This work elucidates how initial fault stress governs the co-evolution of permeability and acoustic emission response, advancing understanding of injection-induced seismicity physics.
Index terms
Keywords
Full text
Attachments
Works cited
References
- Ellsworth, W.L. (2013). Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341 (6142), 1225942.
- Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Avouac, J.-P., Henry, P., Elsworth, D. (2015). Seismicity triggered by fluid injection–induced aseismic slip. Science 348 (6240), 1224–1226.
- Shapiro, S.A., Krüger, O.S., Dinske, C., Langenbruch, C. (2011). Magnitudes of induced earthquakes and geometric scales of fluid-stimulated rock volumes. Geophysics 76 (6), WC55–WC63.
- Elsworth, D., Spiers, C.J., Niemeijer, A.R. (2016). Understanding induced seismicity. Science 354 (6318), 1380–1381.
- Woo, J.U., Kim, M., Sheen, D.H., Kang, T.S., Rhie, J., Grigoli, F., Ellsworth, W.L., Giardini, D. (2019). An in-depth seismological analysis revealing a causal link between the 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake and EGS project. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 13060–13078.
- Passelègue, F. X., Brantut, N. & Mitchell, T. M. (2018). Fault reactivation by fluid injection: controls from stress state and injection rate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 837–846.
- McGarr, A. (2014). Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 119, 1008–1019.
- Galis, M., Ampuero, J.P., Mai, P.M., Cappa, F. (2017). Induced seismicity provides insight into why earthquake ruptures stop. Sci. Adv. 3 (12), eaap7528.
- Li, Z., Elsworth, D., Wang, C. et al. 2021. Constraining maximum event magnitude during injection-triggered seismicity. Nat Commun 12, 1528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20700-4.
- Gutenberg B, Richter C F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4): 185-188.
- Tormann, T. et al. (2015). Randomness of megathrust earthquakes implied by rapid stress recovery after the Japan earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 8, 152–158.