Paper contribution

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations on Rock Masses

Taha Sadeghi Golshan; Amirmohammad Rahimi Lenji; Fateme Asgari Bashkani; Ahmad Fahimifar

Proceedings
EUROCK 2026
Pages
1401-1408
Submitted
2 June 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
12 August 2026

Summary

Abstract

The ultimate bearing capacity of square shallow foundations resting on jointed rock masses represents one of the most complex and fundamental problems in rock mechanics and geotechnical design, primarily due to the inherent heterogeneity of the medium and the highly nonlinear nature of failure mechanisms, which are associated with significant uncertainty. In this study, a combined framework of advanced numerical modelling and machine learning algorithms is employed to develop a robust and accurate predictive approach. To this end, a comprehensive dataset comprising 150 three-dimensional finite element simulations was generated using PLAXIS 3D. The generalized Hoek-Brown failure criterion was adopted for the rock mass, while the Mohr-Coulomb criterion was applied to discontinuity surfaces. The numerical results indicated that bearing capacity is governed by a complex interaction among rock mass quality parameters, intact rock properties, discontinuity characteristics, and the geometry and orientation of joints. Failure behaviour is primarily controlled by joint planes and is characterized by stress concentration, asymmetric deformation patterns, and localized plastic zones along discontinuities. Correlation analysis identified the Geological Strength Index (GSI), the intact rock parameter mi, and the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) as the most influential variables affecting bearing capacity. In the machine learning phase, a comparative assessment of several models demonstrated that ensemble-based methods, particularly Gradient Boosting Regressor and Poisson Regressor, achieved the highest predictive performance, significantly outperforming conventional linear regression approaches. Feature importance analysis further confirmed the dominant roles of GSI and mi. Notably, the developed models, achieved a prediction accuracy of approximately 96% with low error levels. Overall, the results demonstrate that machine learning provides a powerful and reliable framework for modelling the highly nonlinear behavior of shallow foundations on jointed rock masses, offering valuable support for geotechnical design and reducing epistemic uncertainty in engineering practice.

Contributors

Authors

  1. Taha Sadeghi Golshan AmirKabir University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  2. Amirmohammad Rahimi Lenji AmirKabir University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  3. Fateme Asgari Bashkani AmirKabir University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  4. Ahmad Fahimifar AmirKabir University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of ORCID 0000-0002-9397-6269

Index terms

Keywords

Full text

Attachments

Works cited

References

  1. Al-Atroush, M. E., et al. (2024). "Beyond p-y method: A review of artificial intelligence approaches for predicting lateral capacity of drilled shafts in clayey soils." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering16(9): 3812-3840.
  2. Bandis, S., et al. (1983). "Fundamentals of Rock Joint Deformation." 20: 249-268.
  3. Barton, N., et al. (2023). "Advances in joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and its engineering applications." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering15(12): 3352-3379.
  4. Carter, J. P. and F. H. Kulhawy (1992). "Analysis of laterally loaded shafts in rock." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering118(6): 839-855.
  5. Chen, J., et al. (2026). "A dual attention-based deep learning model for lithology identification while drilling." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering18(2): 1177-1192.
  6. Chen, W.-F. and D. Drucker (1969). "Bearing capacity of concrete blocks or rock." Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division95(4): 955-978.
  7. Clausen, J. (2013). "Bearing capacity of circular footings on a Hoek–Brown material." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences57: 34-41.
  8. Dashtgoli, D. S., et al. (2026). "Artificial intelligence for shallow geothermal systems: A review of ground heat exchanger performance modeling." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
  9. Griffiths, D., et al. (2002). "Bearing capacity of rough rigid strip footing on cohesive soil: probabilistic study." Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering128(9): 743-755.
  10. Guo, Y., et al. (2026). "Machine learning-based study on fracture behavior and damage identification of naturally fractured rock–concrete interfaces." Rock mechanics and rock engineering59(4): 5117-5141.
  11. Hoek, E. and E. Brown (2019). "The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI–2018 edition." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering11(3): 445-463.
  12. Hoek, E., et al. (2002). "Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition." Proceedings of NARMS-Tac1(1): 267-273.
  13. Hoek, E. and M. S. Diederichs (2006). "Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences43(2): 203-215.
  14. Khatti, J. and K. S. Grover (2023). "Prediction of compaction parameters for fine-grained soil: Critical comparison of the deep learning and standalone models." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering15(11): 3010-3038.
  15. Kumar, R., et al. (2016). "Determination of blast-induced ground vibration equations for rocks using mechanical and geological properties." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering8(3): 341-349.
  16. Ladanyi, B. and A. Roy (1971). Some aspects of bearing capacity of rock mass. Proceedings of the Seventh Canadian Symposium on Rock Mechanics.
  17. Lenji, A. R., et al. (2025). Chapter 4 - Predicting liquefaction resistance of silty sands using machine learning techniques. Machine Learning in Geohazard Risk Prediction and Assessment. X. He, B. Pradhan and D. Sheng, Elsevier: 83-105.
  18. Lenji, A. R., et al. (2025). Chapter 9 - Computational intelligence in rock engineering management systems. Machine Learning in Geohazard Risk Prediction and Assessment. X. He, B. Pradhan and D. Sheng, Elsevier: 233-285.
  19. Li, S., et al. (2026). "Tunnel ahead prospecting methods and intelligent interpretation of adverse geology: A review." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering18(1): 1-19.
  20. Ma, Z., et al. (2026). "Influence of laser parameters on rock damage: an experimental exploration and machine learning-based predictive modeling." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences200: 106442.
  21. Mahmoodzadeh, A., et al. (2022). "Machine learning techniques to predict rock strength parameters." Rock mechanics and rock engineering55(3): 1721-1741.
  22. Mansouri, M., et al. (2019). "Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses under square and rectangular footings." Computers and Geotechnics111: 1-9.
  23. Marinos, P., et al. (2006). "Variability of the engineering properties of rock masses quantified by the geological strength index: the case of ophiolites with special emphasis on tunnelling." Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment65(2): 129-142.
  24. Marinos, V., et al. (2005). "The geological strength index: applications and limitations." Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment64(1): 55-65.
  25. Merifield, R. S., et al. (2006). "Limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity of rock masses using the generalised Hoek–Brown criterion." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences43(6): 920-937.
  26. Morgenroth, J., et al. (2019). "An overview of opportunities for machine learning methods in underground rock engineering design." Geosciences9(12): 504.
  27. Park, J. and H.-K. Yoon (2026). "Crack density estimation in rock structures using machine learning techniques." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
  28. Pradhan, B., et al. (2025). Machine Learning in Geohazard Risk Prediction and Assessment: From Microscale Analysis to Regional Mapping, Elsevier.
  29. Prakoso, W. A. and F. H. Kulhawy (2004). "Bearing capacity of strip footings on jointed rock masses." Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering130(12): 1347-1349.
  30. Rafiei Renani, H. and M. Cai (2022). "Forty-year review of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion for jointed rock masses." Rock mechanics and rock engineering55(1): 439-461.
  31. Saada, Z., et al. (2008). "Bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rocks obeying a modified Hoek–Brown failure criterion." Computers and Geotechnics35(2): 144-154.
  32. Saadati, G., et al. (2026). "Artificial intelligence-based back analysis of geomechanical parameters in tunnelling: A state-of-the-art review." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
  33. Sabri, M. S., et al. (2025). "Direct and indirect methods for uniaxial compressive strength estimation in various geo-environments: A review." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering17(12): 8241-8275.
  34. Serrano, A. and C. Olalla (1994). Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, Elsevier.
  35. Serrano, A. and C. Olalla (1996). Allowable bearing capacity of rock foundations using a non-linear failure criterium. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, Elsevier.
  36. Serrano, A., et al. (2000). "Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses based on the modified Hoek–Brown criterion." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences37(6): 1013-1018.
  37. Vasarhelyi, B. (2008). Estimating the Poisson's rate value of the rock masses. ISRM International Symposium-Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ISRM.
  38. Vásárhelyi, B. (2009). "A possible method for estimating the Poisson’s rate values of the rock masses." Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica44(3): 313-322.
  39. Waltham, A. and G. Swift (2004). "Bearing capacity of rock over mined cavities in Nottingham." Engineering Geology75(1): 15-31.
  40. Walton, G. and S. Sinha (2022). "Challenges associated with numerical back analysis in rock mechanics." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering14(6): 2058-2071.
  41. Wei, M., et al. (2022). "Application of machine learning in predicting the rate-dependent compressive strength of rocks." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering14(5): 1356-1365.
  42. Wu, Z., et al. (2021). "Real-time rock mass condition prediction with TBM tunneling big data using a novel rock–machine mutual feedback perception method." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering13(6): 1311-1325.
  43. Xiao, Z., et al. (2026). "Prediction of excavation damaged zone depth of chamber groups by damage initiation and spalling limit: Numerical simulation and machine learning algorithms." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering18(4): 2686-2701.
  44. Yang, F., et al. (2024). "Artificial intelligence for mineral exploration: A review and perspectives on future directions from data science." Earth-Science Reviews258: 104941.
  45. Yang, X.-L. and J.-H. Yin (2005). "Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek–Brown failure criterion." International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences42(4): 550-560.
  46. Zhang, L. and H. H. Einstein (1998). "End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock." Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering124(7): 574-584.
  47. Zhang, Q., et al. (2026). "Intelligent early warning system for tunnel boring machine jamming under complex geology." Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.