Paper contribution

Fractal Quantification of Crack Networks: Predicting Rock Damage in Thermally Exposed Rock Environments

Proceedings
EUROCK 2026
Pages
895-900
Submitted
28 January 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
12 August 2026

Summary

Abstract

Engineering activities such as mining, tunneling, and underground energy storage expose rock masses to coupled mechanical loading and thermal disturbances, resulting in progressive damage and long-term performance degradation. Thermal exposure modifies mineral structures, accelerates microcrack initiation and coalescence, and significantly alters the mechanical behavior of rocks. Quantitative characterization of these thermally induced damage processes is therefore critical for reliable risk assessment in rock engineering applications. In this study, fractal analysis is employed to quantify the complexity and evolution of crack networks developed in andesite and andesitic–basaltic rock specimens subjected to thermal treatment and uniaxial compression. Six core specimens were tested, three in their natural state and three after heating to 200 °C. Following uniaxial compressive strength tests, crack surfaces were digitized, converted into binary images, and analyzed using the box-counting method to determine fractal dimensions (D). The results indicate that D values provide a sensitive measure of crack network complexity and exhibit systematic relationships with both thermal exposure and mechanical degradation, including reductions in uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus (E). The findings suggest that fractal-based descriptors provide a useful framework for linking microstructural damage to macroscopic mechanical response in thermally affected rocks through experimentally observed relationships between crack geometry and mechanical response. This approach contributes to improved prediction of rock damage evolution and supports sustainable design and risk management in geotechnical and environmental engineering applications.

Contributors

Authors

  1. Özge Dinç Göğüş Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye ORCID 0000-0003-3227-309X
  2. Ömer Ündül Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye
  3. Enes Zengin Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye ORCID 0000-0002-5740-7763
  4. Mehmet Korkut Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye
  5. Mehmet Mert Doğu Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye ORCID 0009-0008-3802-8144

Index terms

Keywords

Full text

Attachments

Works cited

References

  1. ASTM (2000) Annual Book of ASTM Standards-Soil and Rock, Building Stones, Section-4, Construction Vol. 04.08; ASTM Publications: Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  2. Anderson TL (1989) Application of fractal geometry to damage development and brittle fracture in materials. Scr. Metal. 25, 97–102 (1989).
  3. Bao X, Huang S, Lv Y et al. Thermal Influence on Damage Behavior and Constitutive Response of Granite under Variable Cyclic Loading. Geotech GeolEng 43, 355 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-025-03328-3
  4. Barton CC (1995) Fractal analysis of scaling and spatial clustering of fractures. In Fractals in the Earth Sciences (eds. Barton, C. C. & La Pointe, P. R.), 141–178, Springer Science Business Media, New York.
  5. Barton CC, Larsen E (1995) Fractal geometry of two-dimensional fracture networks at Yucca Mountain, southwestern Nevada. In Fundamentals of Rock Joints (ed. Stephansson, O.), Centek, Björkliden, Sweden.
  6. Berkowitz B, Hadad A (1997) Fractal and multifractal measures of natural and synthetic fracture networks. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 12, 205–12, 208.
  7. Brantut N, Schubnel A,Guéguen Y (2011), Damage and rupture dynamics at the brittle-ductile transition: The case of gypsum, J. Geophys. Res., 116, B01404, doi:10.1029/2010JB007675.
  8. Dinç GöğüşÖ, Avşar E, Develi K, Çalık A (2023) Quantifying the rock damage intensity controlled by mineral compositions: insights from fractal analyses. Fractal and Fractional 7(5):383 https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7050383.
  9. Dinç Göğüş Ö, Avşar E, Çalık A (2025) Fractal Characterization of Crack Patterns in Intact Rocks Under Triaxial Compression. Geotech GeolEng 43, 352, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-025-03314-9
  10. Feder J (1988) Fractals; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 283p.
  11. Gautam PK, Verma AK, Jha MK, Pushpendra Sharma, Singh TN, (2018) Effect of high temperature on physical and mechanical properties of Jalore granite, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 159, 460-474,ISSN 0926-9851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.07.018.
  12. Hirata T (1998) Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: Fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales. Pageoph. 131, 157–170.
  13. Handin J, Hager R (1957) Experimental deformation of sedimentary rocks under confining pressure: Tests at room temperature on dry sample, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 41, 1–50.
  14. Hadizadeh J, Rutter EH (1983), The low temperature brittle‐ductile transition in a quartzite and theoccurence of cataclastic flow in nature, Geol. Rundsch., 72, 493–509.
  15. Ju Y, Xi C, Zhang Y, Mao L, Gao F, Xie H (2018) Laboratory in situ CT observation of the evolution of 3D fracture networks in coal subjected to confining pressures and axial compressive loads: A novel approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 51, 3361–3375.
  16. Lan M, He Y, Wang C et al. (2024) Fractal evolution characteristics of fracture meso-damage in uniaxial compression rock masses using bonded block model. Sci Rep 14, 17979, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69004-3
  17. Li W, Li Q, Qian Y et al. (2023) Structural properties and failure characteristics of granite after thermal treatment and water cooling. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 9, 171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00716-y
  18. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, p. 468.
  19. Roy A, Perfect E, Dunne WM, McKay LD (2007) Fractal characterization of fracture networks: An improved box-counting technique. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B12201, doi:10.1029/2006JB004582.
  20. Saiang C, Miskovsky K (2011) "Effect of Heat on the Mechanical Properties of Selected Rock Types – A Laboratory Study." Paper presented at the 12th ISRM Congress, Beijing, China, October 2011.
  21. Tullis J, YundRA (1992), The brittle ductile transition in feldspar aggregates: An experimental study, in Fault Mechanics and Transport Properties of Rocks, Int. Geophys. Ser., vol. 51, edited by B. Evans and T.‐F. Wong, 89–117, Academic, London.
  22. Wang D, Zeng F, Wei J, Zhang H, Wu Y, Wei Q (2021) Quantitative analysis of fracture dynamic evolution in coal subjected to uniaxial and triaxial compression loads based on industrial CT and fractal theory. J Pet Sci Eng, 196, 108051, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108051.
  23. Yin T, Chen Y, Li X et al. (2021) Effect of high temperature and strain rate on the elastic modulus of rocks: a review. Int J Earth Sci (GeolRundsch) 110, 2639–2660, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-02093-x
  24. Zhang W, Sun Q, Hao S, Geng J, Lv C (2016) Experimental study on the variation of physical and mechanical properties of rock after high temperature treatment, Applied Thermal Engineering, 98, 1297-1304, ISSN 1359-4311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.010.
  25. Zhang F,Lv C, Li K, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li M (2025) Study on the Effect of High Temperature and Cyclic Loading and Unloading Methods on the Mechanical Properties of Granite. Appl. Sci., 15,4448,https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084448
  26. Zhao Y (1998) Crack pattern evolution and a fractal damage constitutive model for rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 35(3), 349–366.