Paper contribution

Application of Machine Learning for Factor of Safety Assessment in a Dolomite Quarry Using Geotechnical and Seismic Inputs

Proceedings
EUROCK 2026
Pages
1343-1348
Submitted
28 January 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
12 August 2026

Summary

Abstract

Slope stability analysis traditionally relies on empirical classifications, analytical methods, and numerical modelling to assess the safety of rock slopes. Although these physics-based approaches provide robust results, their application in large parametric investigations and probabilistic analyses can be computationally demanding. Building upon a comprehensive geological and seismic dataset developed for the Vilonya dolomite quarry in Hungary, this study explores the capability of machine learning (ML) techniques to efficiently predict the Factor of Safety (FoS). The dataset integrates slope geometry, discontinuity characteristics, rock-mass properties derived from the Hoek–Brown and Mohr–Coulomb criteria, and seismic loading conditions representing both static and pseudo-dynamic scenarios. Four supervised learning algorithms—Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Decision Trees—were evaluated to develop surrogate models for FoS prediction. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation to ensure robustness and generalizability. The results demonstrate that ensemble learning achieved the highest predictive accuracy, while kernel-based and neural approaches provided competitive performance. Feature importance analysis indicates that failure plane geometry and seismic loading are the primary controlling factors governing slope stability, consistent with fundamental rock mechanics principles. The findings suggest that ML-based surrogate models can significantly accelerate scenario evaluation and support probabilistic safety assessments. This data-driven framework complements conventional geotechnical methods and offers a practical tool for preliminary design, sensitivity analysis, and rapid stability screening in quarry environments subjected to seismic influence.

Contributors

Authors

  1. Saltanat Yesselbayeva Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Engineering Geology and Geotechnics, Hungary
  2. Péter Görög Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Engineering Geology and Geotechnics, Hungary ORCID 0000-0002-0360-1966

Index terms

Keywords

Full text

Attachments

Works cited

References

  1. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1):5–32. DOI:10.1023/A:1010933404324
  2. Christian JT, Ladd CC, Baecher GB (1994) Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 120(12):2180–2207. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2180)
  3. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20(3):273–297. DOI:10.1007/BF00994018
  4. Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: Limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122(7):577–596. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:7(577)
  5. Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Géotechnique 49(3):387–403. DOI:10.1680/geot.1999.49.3.387
  6. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division 106(GT9):1013–1035.
  7. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. Proceedings of the North American Rock Mechanics Society Meeting, Toronto, Canada, 7–10 July 2002
  8. Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resources Research 48(7):W07401. DOI:10.1029/2011WR011527
  9. Zhang L, Wu X, Skibniewski MJ (2019) Artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A review. Automation in Construction 103:106–122. DOI:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.006
  10. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  11. Engineering Strong Motion Data (2018): Turkey Flat earthquake acceleration data from Parkfield, California, https://esm.mi.ingv.it/, (accessed November 26, 2024).
  12. Bögöly, G., Füzesi, F. (2022): The Evolution of Geotech - 25 Years of Innovation– Hammah et al. (Eds): 180-186. DOI 10.1201/9781003188339-24Menghan Zhang, Jin Wei (2025): PeriodicaPolytechnica Civil Engineering, 69(2), pp. 505–518, DOI 10.3311/PPci.37630